CPC 47, Brazilian Federal Revenue Service Monitoring, and Tax Avoidance among Companies Listed on B3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v20.e3943Palavras-chave:
CPC 47, Tax avoidance, Sectoral analysis, Special monitoringResumo
Objective: To examine the association between the adoption of CPC 47, which modified the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of revenue, and tax avoidance among companies listed on B3.
Method: Analysis of data from 471 companies covering the period from 2010 to 2023, using descriptive statistics, tests of differences in means, panel data regression, and regression discontinuity analysis.
Results: The implementation of CPC 47 was accompanied by a reduction in companies’ effective tax burden. However, the heterogeneity analysis did not reveal significant differential effects in the sectors potentially most affected by the standard. Furthermore, there was no evidence that the standard’s adoption contributed to reducing tax avoidance among companies subject to monitoring by the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service (RFB).
Contributions: This study contributes by showing that the adoption of CPC 47 was accompanied by a lower effective tax burden, without significant differential effects in the most exposed sectors. Furthermore, it indicates that RFB monitoring did not significantly mitigate tax avoidance after the standard’s adoption. The implications of this study provide a basis for evaluating the effectiveness of accounting standards and tax policies in contexts of regulatory flexibility.
Tradução
Referências
Ahmed, K., Chalmers, K., & Khlif, H. (2013). A Meta-analysis of IFRS Adoption Effects. The International Journal of Accounting, 48(2), 173–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2013.04.002
Aladwey, L., & Diab, A. (2023). The determinants and effects of the early adoption of IFRS 15: Evidence from a developing country. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2167544. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2167544.
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
Almunia, M., & Lopez-Rodriguez, D. (2018). Under the Radar: The Effects of Monitoring Firms on Tax Compliance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20160229.
Antinozzi, H. S., & Stanley, D. O. (2024). IRS Audit Detection Risk and Firm Tax Behavior: Can Tax Fraud Be Deterred by Increasing IRS Budgets? Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 9(1), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.2308/JFAR-2023-041
Armstrong, C. S., Glaeser, S., & Kepler, J. D. (2019). Strategic reactions in corporate tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68(1), 101232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2019.03.003.
Augusto, J. A., & Souza, M. M. de. (2021). Características associadas ao nível de evidenciação das receitas de contratos com clientes das companhias de capital aberto brasileiras. Revista Ambiente Contábil - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - ISSN 2176-9036, 13(1), Artigo 1. https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n1ID19409.
Baudot, L., Johnson, J. A., Roberts, A., & Roberts, R. W. (2020). Is Corporate Tax Aggressiveness a Reputation Threat? Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Tax Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04227-3
Bird, A., Edwards, A., & Ruchti, T. G. (2018). Taxes and Peer Effects. The Accounting Review, 93(5), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52004
Braga, R. N. (2017). Efeitos da adoção das IFRS sobre o tax avoidance. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28(75), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201704680.
Brasil. (2014). Lei n.º 12.973, de 13 de maio de 2014. Altera a legislação tributária federal relativa ao IRPJ, à CSLL, ao PIS/Pasep e à Cofins. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 14 maio 2014.
Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H., & Titiunik, R. (2019). Regression Discontinuity Designs Using Covariates. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(3), 442–451. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00760
de Chaisemartin, C., Ciccia, D., D’Haultfœuille, X., & Knau, F. (2024). Difference-in-differences estimators when no unit remains untreated (arXiv:2405.04465, versão 6). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.04465
Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M., & Ma, X. (2020). Simple Local Polynomial Density Estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115(531), 1449–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.201 9.1635480
Carrillo, P., Pomeranz, D., & Singhal, M. (2017). Dodging the Taxman: Firm Misreporting and Limits to Tax Enforcement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20140495.
Charneski, H. (2018). CPC 47 (IFRS 15): Aspectos Tributários na Nova Norma Contábil sobre Receitas. Revista Direito Tributário Atual, 40, 267–288.
Chen, E., & Gavious, I. (2017). The roles of book-tax conformity and tax enforcement in regulating tax reporting behaviour following International Financial Reporting Standards adoption. Accounting & Finance, 57(3), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12172.
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. (2016). Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 47 – Receita de Contrato com Cliente. CPC. http://www.cpc.org.br
Damayanti, T. W. (2019). The effect of IFRS adoption and law enforcement on book tax aggressiveness: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2019.27.
Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle. The Accounting Review, 86(6), 1969–1994. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10130.
Greene, W. (2017). Econometric Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002.
Hasan, M. M., Al-Hadi, A., Taylor, G., & Richardson, G. (2017). Does a Firm’s Life Cycle Explain Its Propensity to Engage in Corporate Tax Avoidance? European Accounting Review, 26(3), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2016.1194220.
Higgins, D., Omer, T. C., & Phillips, J. D. (2015). The Influence of a Firm’s Business Strateg y on its Tax Aggressiveness. C ontemporar y Accounting Research, 32(2), 674–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12087
Hoopes, J. L., Mescall, D., & Pittman, J. A. (2012). Do IRS Audits Deter Corporate Tax Avoidance? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1603–1639. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50187
IASB. (2023). Post-implementation Review of IFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Staff Paper: Review of Academic Literature. March 2023.
Jacob, M., Rohlfing-Bastian, A., & Sandner, K. (2021). Why do not all firms engage in tax avoidance? Review of Managerial Science, 15(2), 459–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00346-3
Jermias, J., & Mahmoudian, F. (2024). Investigating the joint effect of competitive strategies and pay gap on ESG performance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 20(2), 100419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100419
Jiménez-Angueira, C. E. (2018). The effect of the interplay between corporate governance and external monitoring regimes on firms’ tax avoidance. Advances in Accounting, 41, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2018.02.004.
Kabir, H., & Su, L. (2022). How did IFRS 15 affect the revenue recognition practices and financial statements of firms? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 49, 100507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2022.100507
Kałdoński, M., & Jewartowski, T. (2020). Do firms using real earnings management care about taxes? Evidence from a high book-tax conformity country. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101351
KPMG Auditores Independentes – KPMG. (2016). IFRS em destaque 03/16: IFRS 15 – Receitas. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/br/pdf/2016/10/br-ifrs-em-destaque-03-16.pdf
Kubick, T. R., Lynch, D. P., Mayberry, M. A., & Omer, T. C. (2015). Product Market Power and Tax Avoidance: Market Leaders, Mimicking Strategies, and Stock Returns. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 675–702. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50883.
Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281.
Marques, V. A., Campos, B. da S., Alencastre, B. Z., Louzada, L. C., & Martinez, A. L. (2022a). Agressividade Tributária, Estágios do Ciclo de Vida e Nível de Investimentos: Uma Análise do Efeito Moderador em Empresas Listadas na B3. Contabilidade Vista & Revista, 33(2), Artigo 2. https://doi.org/10.22561/cvr.v33i2.6796.
Marques, V. A., Zucolotto, A. de F., Guzzo Acerbe, L., & Zanoteli, E. J. (2022b). Incerteza Econômica e Nível de Agressividade Tributária das Empresas Listadas na B3. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), 16(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v16i1.2992
Nakao, S. H., & Gray, S. J. (2018). The Impact of IFRS in Brazil: The Legacy of Mandatory Book-tax Conformity. Australian Accounting Review, 28(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12223.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers Brasil Ltda – PwC. (2017). IFRS 15: O futuro está aqui: Analisando o impacto da nova norma sobre reconhecimento de receita nos seus negócios (pp. 1-19). https://www.pwc.com.br/pt/estudos/servicos/auditoria/2017/futuro_ifrs_17.pdf
Shahn, Z., & Hatfield, L. A. (2024). Group difference in differences can identify effect heterogeneity in non-canonical settings (arXiv:2408.16039). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.16039
Receita Federal do Brasil. (2017). Instrução Normativa RFB n.º 1.700, de 14 de março de 2017. Dispõe sobre a determinação e o pagamento do IRPJ e da CSLL. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 16 mar. 2017.
Receita Federal do Brasil. (2020). Portaria RFB n.º 4.888, de 7 de dezembro de 2020. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 9 dez. 2020.
Receita Federal do Brasil. (2024). Portaria RFB n.º 505, de 30 de dezembro de 2024. Dispõe sobre os critérios para a classificação de pessoas físicas e jurídicas como maiores contribuintes no âmbito da Secretaria Especial da Receita Federal do Brasil. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 31 dez. 2024.
Rutledge, R. W., Karim, K. E., & Kim, T. (2016). The FASB’s and IASB’s New Revenue Recognition Standard: What Will Be the Effects on Earnings Quality, Deferred Taxes, Management Compensation, and on Industry-Specific Reporting? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 27(6), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22188
Slemrod, J. (2019). Tax Compliance and Enforcement. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(4), 904–954. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20181437.
Souza, P. V. S. de, Gonçalves, R. de S., & Silva, C. A. T. (2022). O Impacto da IFRS 15 na Qualidade dos Accruals e no Gerenciamento de Resultados das Empresas Brasileiras de Capital Aberto. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24(4), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v24i4.4197
Tennant, S. N., & Tracey, M. R. (2019). Corporate profitability and effective tax rate: The enforcement effect of large taxpayer units. Accounting and Business Research, 49(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1512398.
Wang, C., Wilson, R. J., Zhang, S., & Zou, H. (2022). Political costs and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from sin firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(1), 106861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106861
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 1969 JOAO VICTOR DECOTE, VAGNER ANTONIO MARQUES
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
