Afinal, do que Depende a Satisfação do Revisor para a sua Atividade na Comunicação Científica?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v14i3.2449Keywords:
Revisor, Conflito de função, Ambiguidade de função, Satisfação do revisorAbstract
Objetivo: Identificar o que estimula ou inibe a satisfação do revisor no desempenho de suas tarefas, a partir da abordagem seminal de Katz e Kahn (1970) onde o conflito de função e a ambiguidade de função são analisados no que se refere ao papel do revisor.
Método: A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de survey com a comunidade de pesquisa de contabilidade e administração, resultando em 153 questionários válidos. Para o tratamento dos dados, foi utilizada a estatística descritiva e a modelagem de equações estruturais.
Resultados: O posicionamento do periódico em rankings, como Qualis e JCR está entre os aspectos que mais afetam favoravelmente a satisfação do revisor. A ambiguidade de função impacta negativamente a satisfação do revisor. Os elementos de conflito de função não foram identificados como afetando negativamente a satisfação.
Contribuições: O revisor de artigos acadêmicos desempenha uma atividade fundamental na construção do conhecimento por proporcionar o aperfeiçoamento e a confiabilidade da publicação, por isso, entender como a motivação, a ambiguidade de função e o conflito de função impactam a satisfação do revisor pode aumentar o potencial de gestão pelos editores de periódicos acadêmicos e valorizar o papel do revisor.
Palavras-chave: Revisor. Conflito de função. Ambiguidade de função. Satisfação do revisor.
References
Bailey, C. D., Hermanson, D. R., & Louwers, T. J. (2008). An examination of the peer review process in accounting journals. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(2), 55–72. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2008.04.001
Berk, J. B., Harvey, C. R., & Hirshleifer, D. (2017). How to write an effective referee report and improve the scientific review process. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 231–244. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.1.231
Cabral, S. (2018). Autores, pareceristas e editores: tripé do processo de revisão de artigos científicos. Revista Administração de Empresas, 58(4), 433-437.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. (2nd. ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Coniam, D. (2012). Exploring reviewer reactions to manuscripts submitted to academic journals. System, 40(4), 544–553. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.002
Engers, M., & Gans, J. S. (1998). Why referees are not paid (enough). The American Economic Review, 88(5), 1341–1349.
Fichter, C. (2010). A research study of role conflict, role ambiguity, job satisfaction, and burnout among financial advisors. (Tese de Doutorado), Lynn Univeristy.
Fisher, R. T. (1995). Role stress, the type a behaviour pattern, and external auditor job satisfaction and performance. (Dissertação, Master of Commerce and Management), Lincoln University, New Zealand.
Gilmore, A., Carson, D., & Perry, C. (2006). Academic publishing: best practice for editors, guest editors, authors and reviewers. European Business Review, 18 (6), 468-478.
Gregson, T., & Wendell, J. (1994). Role conflict, role ambiguity, job satisfaction and the moderating effect of job-related self-esteem: a latent variable anal. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(2), 106-113.
Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Harzing, A-W, & Wal, Ron van der. (2007). Google Scholar : the democratization of citation analysis ? Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, (November). Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228856805_Google_Scholar_the_democratization_of_citation_analysis?enrichId=rgreq-3c339ee2dacd0e29c7dbe1b566d91e34-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzIyODg1NjgwNTtBUzo5OTI2OTQxOTczMjk5NUAxNDAwNjc5MDgyMjgz&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity. Oxford, England: John Wiley.
Karadal, H., Ay, U., & Cuhadar, M. T. (2008). The effect of role conflict and role ambiguity on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a study in the public and private sectors. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 13(2), 195-214.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1970). Psicologia social das organizações (2nd. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Mihalek, E. W. (1989). Role conflict and ambiguity of engineering personnel in a government agency with effects on job related measures. (Tese, Doctor of Education), Temple University, The Faculty of the Graduate School, United States.
Moizer, P. (2009). Publishing in accounting journals: a fair game? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 285–304. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.08.003
Montgomery, M. R. (2011). Does absense of managerial communication negatively influence job satisfaction? A quantitative examination of the correlation between job satisfaction and role conflict and role ambiguity among high-tech employees. (Tese, Doctor of Philosophy), Capella University, David Chapman, Psy.D, Dean, Harold Abel School of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Oler, D. K., & Pasewark, W. R. (2016). How to review a paper. Issues in Accounting Education, 31(2), 219–234. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50748
Palomino, M. N., & Frezatti, F. (2016). Role conflict, role ambiguity and job satisfaction: Perceptions of the brazilian controllers. Revista de Administração, 51(2), 165–181. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1232
Reuber, A. R. (2010). Strengthening Your Literature Review. Family Business Review, 23(2), 105–108. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510368259
Rigo, A. S., & Ventura, A. C. (2019). Por quê e como nos tornamos avaliadores de artigos científicos? Editorial. Revista Organizações & Sociedade, 26(89), 194-199. doi: 10.1590/1984-9260890
Rivara, F. P., Cummings, P., Ringold, S., Bergman, A. B., Joffe, A., & Christakis, D. A. (2007). A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors. The Journal of Pediatrics, 151(2), 202–5. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.008
Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quartely, 15(2), 150-163.
Sharma, P. (2016). Editor's note - a year in review, Family Business Review 2017, 30(1), 7–10.
Singh, J., & Rhoads, G. K. (1991). Boundary role ambiguity in marketing-oriented positions: a multidimensional, multifaceted operationalization. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 328-338.
Tarrant, T. A. (2008). Role conflict, role ambiguity and job satisfaction of the nurse executive. (Tese, Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Nursing), University of Nevada , Division of Health Sciences, Las Vegas.
Trzesniak, P., Plata-Caviedes, T, & Córdoba-Salgado, O. A. (2012). Qualidade de conteúdo, o grande desafio para os editores científicos, Revista Colombiana de Psicologia, 21(1), 57–78.
Van De Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527385
Wright, James T. C., & Giovinazzo, R. A. (2000). DELPHI - uma ferramenta de apoio ao planejamento prospectivo. Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração, 1, 54-65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License, which allows the sharing of the work and recognition of authorship and its initial publication in this journal. This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, or create derivative works, even for commercial purposes, provided credit is given for the original creation.
b)There is no financial compensation to the authors in any capacity, for articles published in RePEc.c) The articles published in RePEc are the sole responsibility of the authors.
